Public talk outlines pdf

In addition, if you intend on using the newer ACCDB format then you must look through the support files section. During the installation, you are asked which language you would like to use for the database.

The database will already have the talk titles and categories in the selected language. These languages are supported:. Thank you very much to brothers and sisters who have been willing to do these translations.

Please let me know if you would like to consider translating it into another language. Several users have requested the ability to enter the addresses of the speakers and coordinators, including phone numbers. I am reluctant to implement this due to my understanding of the legislation in the UK.

I have provided 5 generic memo fields and their labels can be customised as required. I trust that this facility will be used as appropriate.

Thus there are a few requirements that must be met for this utility to operate:. If this is the first time you are downloading Public Talks, then please read the Support Files topic first. This will avoid potential problems in using Public Talks.

This website uses cookies to improve the website and your experience. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Read more. It runs on the macOS platform. Subscribe to the Newsletter to keep up to date. Use the Support Forum to find answers to frequently asked questions and report issues or bugs.

Views 8. Top Posters In This Topic 1 1 2. Popular Days Feb 7 2 Apr 25 1 Apr 28 1. Popular Days Feb 7 2 posts Apr 25 1 post Apr 28 1 post. Popular Posts Jack Ryan February 7, Jack Ryan Upvote Loading ARchiv L Posted April 25, Posted April 25, ARchiv L Posted April 28, Posted April 28, Go to topic listing. Conducting Ourselves Honestly at All Times By Guest Nicole, October 9, honesty public talk 10 and 2 more Tagged with: honesty public talk 10 public talks conducting ourselves honestly at all times.

By The Librarian , January 16, what gods rulership can do for us? By Guest Nicole, November 26, public talk jw talks and 3 more Tagged with: public talk jw talks public talks why be guided by the bible? Looking At Youths From Jehovah's Standpoint By The Librarian , November 27, public talks looking at youths from jehovahs standpoint and 1 more Tagged with: public talks looking at youths from jehovahs standpoint youth.

New Public Talk "Rescue From World Distress" By Jack Ryan , June 19, public talk rescue from world distress and 2 more Tagged with: public talk rescue from world distress public talk outlines outlines. Recently Browsing No registered users viewing this page.

Week Month Year All Time. TrueTomHarley JW Insider Anna Arauna Chinese Coronavirus could be a bioweapon that escaped containment. The biggest names own Bitcoin. It only took 2 years to find out Fauci was behind the funding of the virus Details of Fauci behind its origin here: Hello guest!

Witness 2, Member Joined: March 8, Last active: 1 minute ago. Dirais-tu que tu es une personne humble? En quel sens? Jesus had just got done saying that they were not from God and were also liars, but yet they didn't want to stone him. Why wasn't it until only after he said "I have been" did they want to stone him? In your Bible, you have a word 'me' removed from John Your Kingdom Interlinear Translation proves that the missing word 'me' must be there.

If translated correctly, doesn't this mean that we can pray to Jesus himself? If old false teachings can simply be explained away by receiving "new light" then isn't this like the WatchTower setting themselves up to never be wrong or accountable?

If old false teachings can simply be explained away by receiving "new light", then it is theoretically possible that what you are teaching now may actually be false because in another 5 years or so there can be "new light" again. Since this is the case, wouldn't Jehovah be responsible for spreading false teaching? If the Holy Spirit is only Jehovah's active force, why does the Holy Spirit speak and use the pronouns "I" and "me" about himself in places like Acts and Hebrews ?

Why does your Bible render the word 'proskuneo' as 'obeisance' in regards to Jesus, but as 'worship' in regards to Jehovah and even Satan? Why did the translators of your Bible conveniently fail to insert the word 'Jehovah' in Philippians , Romans , and 1 Corinthians ? Why does JW artwork consistently show through all the years Jesus with a single nail through his wrist at the time of crucifixion?

Scriptures do not say anything about the wrist and John says that more than one nail was used for his hands. Ignoring the direct correlation between God and the Holy Spirit, if the Holy Spirit is not a person and is just God's active force, how can it even be lied to? How do you explain the direct correlation made between the Holy Spirit and Jehovah made at Acts and Isaiah ? There is even a footnote between the two passages in your own Bible.

How do you explain the direct correlation made between the Holy Spirit and Jehovah made at Hebrews and Psalms ? There are multiple footnotes between the two passages in the NWT. How do you explain Rev. Also, how do you explain the singular words 'his' and 'him' being used when both Jehovah and Jesus are the subject?

Why do you make a big deal out of the invented name 'Jehovah' when your own organization admitted several times that nobody actually knows the true name of God?

Since Jehovah's Witnesses believe that you cannot truly know someone without knowing their name, doesn't this mean that you don't know your own God then since nobody knows the true name of God? Since God is all-powerful and all-knowing, why is it that God let his name remain unknown, but we know the name of Jesus? Why is it that we don't know the name of God, but we do know the name of Jesus and it is his name by which we are saved and it is his name that is above EVERY name?

Why is it that you are called 'Jehovah's Witnesses' but Isaiah says God would call his people by a new name single name, not names and that new name was already assigned in Acts ?

I left the WatchTower. Now what? They take Matthew to a whole new level. For example, they make a big deal about such a topic, but then teach such things like Jesus is Michael the Archangel!

There is more proof from the Bible that he died on a cross than there is for the torture stake. Some of the proof is listed below. So there was more than 1 nail used for his hands. Hands stretched horizontally to the sides, as would be the case with a cross, would require more than 1 nail.

Notice that it doesn't say 'above his hands' or 'above his arms'. Which would have been necessary if his arms were stretched vertically on a torture stake. Rather, it says "above his head" which is completely accurate if his arms were stretched horizontally on a cross. John in the NWT also gives us a clue. These clues suggest that the sign was big. It is saying that many people read the sign since it was near the city and because it was in multiple languages.

It wasn't some little sign that could only be read by the followers of Jesus, the religious rulers, and soldiers who were standing up close to Jesus. There would have been no point in making a sign in 3 languages only to have it read by the people who were up close to Jesus.

So the sign had to be big enough to accomplish the goal of it being read by people of the city, which it sucessfully did according to the verse. It at least had to be big enough to adequately contain the phrase in 3 languages and not only 1. Since the sign had to be a good size, there probably would not have been enough room on the torture stake at the top above his vertically stretched arms.

Not unless they had a custom-sized torture stake prepared for him in advance. Which would go against what the Bible says since Jesus was taken at night and he was sent to different locations before his death. The Bible implies that the circumstances leading to his death were in haste. Even the sign had to be prepared on the fly.

They were not prepared for all this. So they certainly used the same standard length pieces of wood for Jesus as they did for everyone else. This theory lends evidence that Jesus died on a Cross with arms stretched horizontally.

Only arms streteched horizontally would have left plenty of room at the top for the big sign! The Jehovah's Witnesses consistently illustrate in their artwork Jesus having a single nail through his wrists. Nowhere in scripture is the wrist ever mentioned in regards to the crucifixion of Jesus. Also, notice how small the text in the sign is. A sign of this size would not be easily readable to anyone other than people standing directly in front of Jesus.

The sign was probably much bigger to have more visibility. See point 3 above. The WatchTower consistently illustrate in their artwork Jesus having a nail through his wrists and not his hands. More inaccurate artwork produced by the WatchTower. Notice in both images a single nail through the wrist.

And again, the wrist had nothing to do with this. Also, notice again such a small sign. In reality, someone who would go to the trouble of having a sign made in 3 languages would not make the sign so small so that it would be hard to see. Also, notice on the left image how there is little room left at the top of the torture stake for a sign.

More inaccurate artwork showing Jesus having a single nail through his wrists and not his hands. Some of their same arguments can even be used against them to prove they are wrong.

Some examples of these invalid arguments are below. Jesus cannot be God because he is the Son. Anyways, human logic is not the final authority.

The Bible, which is God's Word, is the final authority. It is a term related to position, authority, and status. The Bible has the term 'firstborn' in other verses and it has nothing to do with being born created first. For example, David was firstborn, but he was actually the last born. Another example is how Jacob was the firstborn, but he actually was not born first.

The context of Colossians itself proves this point. It is talking about Christ's Supremacy. Of course, the Watchtower knows all this and it is why they have perverted this text by adding the word 'other' multiple times in Colossians chapter 1. See Psalms where it says David would be placed as firstborn even after he already existed.

Psalms 89 has it's final fulfillment with Jesus Christ himself! Jesus, who is in the line of David, is the king of kings, he is the ruler over all the kings of the earth, and he will rule forever.

So Jesus, who is in the line of David and who fulfilled the prophecy about David, had the term firstborn placed on him and it has nothing to do with him being created. Psalms 89 also agrees with point 1 above because it links the term firstborn with position, authority, and status. See Romans where it says Jesus would be firstborn among many brothers.

It's talking about humans here. Again, this verse has nothing to do with Jesus being created. The term here is in reference to his Earthly life.

He was born by the Spirit just like we too are all to be born by the Spirit in his likeness. It says "firstborn from the dead". Again, it has nothing to do with being born or created. This verse also agrees with point 1 above and links the term 'firstborn' with position, authority, and status since it says Jesus is the Ruler of the kings of the Earth.

Jesus cannot be God because he never said he is God. Jesus never even said directly he is the Son of God, but we all know he is. The 'Trinity' cannot be true since it has pagan history. Look at your own religion before using this argument. If Charles Taze Russell was alive today, he would be disfellowshipped in a heartbeart.

This argument is simply invalid because Satan likes to mimic and counterfeit God. Of course, he will take a Biblical concept and twist it to mislead others later. It's what he does. The 'Trinity' cannot be true because the word never appears in the Bible. The word 'Trinity' is just a word that everybody is familiar with. The concept of the trinity is clearly in the Bible.

You are wrong because we have the truth! The Jehovah's Witness religion has bad history, has made false prophecies, has perverted God's word, and has been deceptive. We have the most accurate Bible translation in existence. Your prior Bible versions can also prove the same thing when compared to the new version. Furthermore, the so-called translators remain secret to this day.

When asked why this is the case, a JW will say it is to keep glory from going to the translators. Which is an excuse. The names of more important Jehovah's Witnesses do not remain secret.

For example, the governing body members are all known. The so-called translators are the only ones that remain secret. You can take any well known Bible and you can find the translators responsible.

For example, the new NET Bible has a list of professional scholars and translators with their actual names, credentials, and education. The NET includes more than translation notes to explain why verses were translated the way they were. This is complete transparency. Unlike the New World Translation which is secretive and deceptive. Secondly, Jehovah himself in your own Bible is called 'Mighty God'. You cannot know someone unless you know their name. According to your own Watchtower organization, they do not know God's name and say it is impossible for anyone to know God's true name.

There is a section on this website dedicated to this topic. Therefore, you are admitting that you don't truly know your own God. The Bible shows us that it is possible to know God without knowing his name. See Exodus where it says that Jehovah appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but he never revealed his name to them. Yet, not only did they know him, but God made a covenant with them!

Secondly, all one needs to do is consider some real life situations to know that it is certainly possible to know someone without knowing their name. Let's say you went to school with someone for years during childhood.

Years later, you see that person at the supermarket from the distance and say "I know him". You can recall childhood memories in great detail of being together at school and talking with that person. Yet, you no longer can remember the person's name! You still know the person though. Or let's say someone gets a legal name change. You could know a person intimately for years, but if they were to get their name changed, it would not prevent you from knowing that person and it doesn't mean you would know that person any less.

Another real life example is when someone goes by a false name or a nick name. You could know someone for years and call them by a name that is not actually their real name.

It would not mean you never knew the person or know the person any less. Matthew proves we need to pray to God in his personal name. He did not do this, but only ever said "Father".

Considering this is a model prayer, Jesus failed to do the job, if JW logic is true. Secondly, Jesus prayed that the Father's name be sanctified or hallowed depending on what translation you use.

This means to be made set apart or more holy.